Algebraic Structures | Solving the Matrix Commutator MX = XM | f: R+→Z map a positive real number to the first digit to the right of the decimal point : Well-defined ?

Algebraic Structures | Well-Defined Function Check

Algebraic Structures | Well-Defined Function

Determine whether the following function is well defined:

Function Definition:

where ℝ⁺ = positive real numbers

Rule: f(r) = first digit after decimal point in decimal expansion of r

Question: Is f well-defined?

Solution

Definition of Well-Defined Function

A function is well-defined if:

  1. Every input in the domain produces exactly one output
  2. If an input has multiple representations, all representations give the same output

For real numbers, this means the output must not depend on which decimal representation we choose.

Step 1: Understanding the Function

The function f takes a positive real number r and returns the first digit after the decimal point in its decimal expansion.

Example:

If r = 3.14159…, then f(r) = 1

If r = 0.5, then we need to check: 0.5 = 0.5000… gives f(r) = 5

The problem: Some real numbers have two different valid decimal expansions.

Step 2: Decimal Representation Ambiguity

Certain numbers have two decimal expansions:

Terminating decimals have two representations:

Example 1: 0.5 can be written as:

  • 0.500000… (infinite zeros)
  • 0.499999… (infinite nines)

Example 2: 1.0 can be written as:

  • 1.000000… (infinite zeros)
  • 0.999999… (infinite nines)

Both expansions represent the same real number.

Step 3: Counterexample Analysis

Take r = 0.5:

Representation 1: 0.5000…

Representation 2: 0.4999…

Critical Problem: The same real number 0.5 gives different outputs (5 vs 4) depending on which decimal representation we choose!
Step 4: General Pattern

For any terminating decimal like:

Standard form: N.d₁d₂…dₖ where dₖ ≠ 0

This can also be written as: N.d₁d₂…(dₖ−1)999…

Example: 2.37 = 2.37000… = 2.36999…

  • 2.37000…f = 3
  • 2.36999…f = 3 (still, in this case)

But when borrowing occurs:

1.0 = 1.000… = 0.999…

  • 1.000…f = 0
  • 0.999…f = 9

The existence of even one counterexample (1.0 or 0.5) is enough to show f is not well-defined.

Conclusion

The function f is NOT WELL-DEFINED because:

  1. Some positive real numbers have multiple decimal expansions
  2. Different expansions can give different first decimal digits
  3. The output depends on the representation, not just the number value
  4. Examples like 0.5 and 1.0 provide clear counterexamples

A well-defined function must give the same output for the same input regardless of how it’s represented.

Scroll to Top
logo
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.